Boeing: Turbulent Times

Sector

IndustrialsAviation

Background

Jon Ostrower is the founder and editor-in-chief of The Air Current. We cover Boeing's legendary history and recent challenges, what it takes to develop and build new planes, and what commercial aviation might look like in the future.

Cover

Date

September 27, 2023

Episode Number

129

Business Breakdown: Boeing Corporation

Background / Overview

Boeing, founded in 1916 by William Boeing in Seattle, is a cornerstone of the global aerospace industry, producing commercial aircraft, defense systems, and services. With over a century of history, Boeing has evolved from building fabric-covered planes to advanced carbon fiber composite jetliners like the 787, capable of nonstop flights spanning 8,000 miles. The company operates as a duopoly alongside Airbus in the commercial aviation market, with its commercial segment accounting for approximately 40% of its revenue. Boeing’s operations are deeply integrated into the economic and political fabric of the United States, serving as a strategic asset and an instrument of soft power. Its business is divided into three primary segments: Commercial Airplanes (BCA), Defense, Space & Security (BDS), and Global Services (BGS). This analysis focuses on the commercial segment, which drives significant revenue and is central to Boeing’s identity.

Boeing’s commercial business thrives on two primary demand drivers: growth in emerging markets (e.g., China, India, Middle East, Latin America) and replacement of aging fleets in mature markets (e.g., North America, Europe). The company has historically aligned production rates with demand cycles, delivering airplanes to capture revenue upon delivery while also generating a long-tail services business for maintenance and upgrades. However, this cyclical alignment has led to volatility, with production ramp-ups followed by layoffs during downturns. The 737 MAX crisis (2018–2020) and subsequent supply chain challenges have further exposed vulnerabilities in Boeing’s model, making stability and execution critical to its future.

Ownership / Fundraising / Recent Valuation

Boeing is a publicly traded company (NYSE: BA), and specific details on recent valuations or transactions (e.g., enterprise value or multiples) are not provided in the transcript. However, the company’s equity value per share nearly tripled from 2016 to 2018, reflecting its status as a market darling before the 737 MAX crashes. The transcript notes a peak stock price approaching $500 per share, but no current valuation metrics are given. Boeing’s strategic importance to the U.S. government and its role in global trade suggest it benefits from implicit sovereign backing, though no explicit fundraising details are mentioned.

Key Products / Services / Value Proposition

Boeing’s commercial segment focuses on designing, manufacturing, and delivering jetliners, with key products including:

• 737 Series (Single-Aisle): The workhorse of Boeing’s portfolio, designed for short- to medium-haul flights. The 737 MAX, introduced in 2017, offers improved fuel efficiency but faced significant setbacks due to two fatal crashes (2018–2019) linked to the MCAS flight control system. List prices range from $110 million to $130 million, though discounts of 40–60% are common, yielding actual prices of approximately $50–55 million per plane.
• 787 Dreamliner (Twin-Aisle): A long-haul aircraft known for its carbon fiber composite design and fuel efficiency, enabling routes like Perth to London. The 787 faced significant cost overruns during development (estimated at $14–60 billion against a planned $5 billion).
• 777/777X (Twin-Aisle): A long-haul aircraft with the 777X offering updated carbon fiber wings and new engines for enhanced efficiency. The 777 was a cash cow in the 2010s, generating significant cash flow during the 787’s early losses.

Value Proposition:

• Fuel Efficiency and Operating Cost Reduction: Boeing’s aircraft are designed to minimize fuel burn and maintenance costs, aligning with airlines’ focus on “faster, better, cheaper” operations. This is critical as airlines operate within a fixed ecosystem (30,000–40,000 feet altitude, 0.8–0.9 Mach speed).
• Long-Term Relationships: Aircraft purchases create 25–30-year partnerships, encompassing simulators, pilot training, and maintenance, fostering high switching costs and customer lock-in.
• Services Business: Maintenance, upgrades, and tools for aircraft lifecycle management provide a stable, high-margin revenue stream, estimated to account for 70% of an airplane’s lifecycle cost.

Segments and Revenue Model

Boeing’s commercial segment generates revenue through two primary streams:

1. Aircraft Sales: Revenue is primarily recognized upon delivery, with about two-thirds of the final price paid at delivery and the remainder through predelivery payments. The cost to build a mature aircraft (e.g., 737, A320) is approximately $25–35 million, sold for $50–55 million after discounts. Profit margins range from 5–15%, improving as programs mature.
2. Services: Maintenance, upgrades, and lifecycle support generate stable, high-margin revenue. This segment is less cyclical than aircraft sales, as it supports the installed base over 25–30 years.

Revenue Drivers:

• Growth Markets: Emerging markets like China, India, and the Middle East drive demand for new aircraft to support expanding air travel.
• Replacement Demand: Mature markets replace older, less fuel-efficient planes with newer models like the 737 MAX or 787.
• Production Rates: Revenue scales with delivery volumes, with higher rates reducing unit costs through operating leverage.

Splits and Mix

• Geographic Mix: Historically, North America and Europe dominated demand, but emerging markets (China, India, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Latin America) are increasingly significant. China’s demand is geopolitically sensitive, with delays in 737 MAX deliveries due to trade tensions.
• Product Mix: Single-aisle aircraft (737) dominate volume, while twin-aisle aircraft (787, 777) cater to long-haul routes. The 737 MAX backlog is approximately 5,000 orders, while Airbus has a 6,000–7,000 aircraft backlog.
• Channel Mix: Sales are direct to airlines, with discounts negotiated based on volume, maintenance contracts, and lifecycle deals. The economic officers of the U.S. State Department support Boeing’s sales campaigns, highlighting its strategic role.
• End-Market Mix: Airlines range from legacy carriers to low-cost and ultra-low-cost carriers, with the latter driving demand for fuel-efficient single-aisle planes.

Mix Shifts:

• Geographic Shift: Growing demand from China and India is reshaping the market, though geopolitical risks (e.g., China’s preference for COMAC’s C919) pose challenges.
• Product Shift: The oversupply of twin-aisle aircraft (pre-COVID) led to a focus on single-aisle production, with the 737 MAX central to Boeing’s recovery.

KPIs

• Production Rate: Currently ~30–40 737s per month, down from a peak of 42 per month. Stability in production is critical for revenue and cost efficiency.
• Backlog: ~4,000–5,000 aircraft, indicating years of demand but requiring execution to convert orders into deliveries.
• Safety Metrics: Post-MAX crisis, safety and quality assurance are paramount, with new programs like a Chief Safety Officer and ombudsman roles introduced.

Headline Financials

• Revenue: Peaked at over $100 billion in 2018, driven by high production rates and stable demand. Currently run-rating at ~$60 billion (40% below peak), reflecting lower delivery volumes post-MAX grounding and supply chain disruptions.
• EBITDA/Profit Margins: Commercial aircraft margins range from 5–15%, with mature programs achieving higher margins. The services business likely has higher margins, though specific figures are not provided.
• Free Cash Flow (FCF): Significant cash generation in 2016–2018 (driven by 737 and 777) supported Boeing’s market darling status. Post-2018, FCF has been pressured by MAX grounding costs, 787 losses, and supply chain investments. No specific FCF figures are provided.
• Historical Context: The 737 and 777 were cash cows in the 2010s, offsetting 787 development losses. The MAX grounding (20 months) and supply chain fragility have delayed recovery.

Value Chain Position

Boeing operates as an aircraft integrator in the aerospace value chain, designing and assembling aircraft while outsourcing significant components (e.g., fuselages, wings, engines) to suppliers like Spirit AeroSystems and GE. Its primary activities include:

• Design and Engineering: Developing aircraft with fuel efficiency and performance enhancements.
• Manufacturing and Assembly: Coordinating thousands of suppliers to produce millions of parts with precision (tolerances of 1/1000th inch).
• Sales and Delivery: Negotiating with airlines and delivering aircraft, supported by U.S. government backing.
• Aftermarket Services: Providing maintenance, upgrades, and lifecycle support, which is high-margin and stable.

Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy:

• Direct sales to airlines, leveraging long-term relationships and government support.
• Discounts (40–60%) and lifecycle deals (maintenance contracts) enhance competitiveness.
• Focus on fuel efficiency aligns with airline cost priorities.

Competitive Advantage:

• Barriers to Entry: High capital requirements ($15–20 billion per program) and institutional knowledge create formidable barriers.
• Switching Costs: Airlines face significant costs (training, maintenance infrastructure) when switching manufacturers, locking in Boeing’s installed base.
• Sovereign Backing: U.S. government support enhances Boeing’s global reach and resilience.

Customers and Suppliers

• Customers: Global airlines, ranging from legacy carriers (e.g., Delta, United) to low-cost carriers (e.g., Ryanair, Southwest). Customer diversification reduces risk, though geopolitical tensions (e.g., China) impact sales.
• Suppliers: Thousands of suppliers, with key partners like Spirit AeroSystems (fuselages) and GE (engines). The supply chain is complex, with four to six levels of sub-suppliers for raw materials like titanium. Supplier coordination is a core competency, but recent fragility has disrupted production.

Pricing

• Contract Structure: Aircraft sales involve predelivery payments (30–50% of price) and final payment (50–70%) upon delivery. Discounts of 40–60% are standard, driven by competition with Airbus and airline negotiating power.
• Pricing Drivers:
• Industry Fundamentals: Duopoly dynamics allow Boeing to maintain pricing power, though discounts reflect competition.
• Mission-Criticality: Aircraft are critical to airline operations, supporting premium pricing for fuel-efficient models.
• Customer Type: Large airlines secure deeper discounts, while smaller carriers pay closer to list price.
• Mix Effects: Lifecycle deals (e.g., maintenance contracts) influence effective pricing.

Bottoms-Up Drivers

Revenue Model & Drivers

Boeing’s commercial revenue model is driven by:

• Aircraft Sales: Revenue is tied to delivery volumes, with ~$50–55 million per 737 MAX after discounts. The backlog of 4,000–5,000 aircraft ensures long-term revenue visibility.
• Services: Maintenance and upgrades generate recurring revenue, estimated at 70% of an aircraft’s lifecycle cost. This stream is high-margin and less cyclical.

Volume Drivers:

• End-Market Growth: Emerging markets (China, India) drive new aircraft demand, while mature markets focus on replacements.
• Switching Costs: High switching costs ensure repeat orders from existing customers.
• Geopolitical Factors: China’s preference for COMAC’s C919 and trade tensions delay deliveries.

Pricing Drivers:

• Competition: Airbus’s A320neo competes directly with the 737 MAX, forcing discounts.
• Value-Add: Fuel efficiency and reliability justify premium pricing, though discounts erode margins.
• Geopolitical Influence: U.S. government support enhances Boeing’s ability to secure orders.

Revenue Trajectory:

• Pre-2018: Strong growth to >$100 billion, driven by 737 and 777 production.
• Post-2018: Decline to ~$60 billion due to MAX grounding, supply chain issues, and twin-aisle oversupply.
• Future: Recovery depends on stabilizing production at 42+ 737s per month and resolving geopolitical barriers.

Cost Structure & Drivers

Boeing’s cost structure includes:

• Variable Costs (COGS): ~$25–35 million per aircraft, including engines, fuselages, and interiors. Key drivers include raw materials (e.g., titanium), labor, and supplier pricing. Inflation and supply chain disruptions have increased costs.
• Fixed Costs: R&D ($15–20 billion per new program), manufacturing facilities, and overhead. Fixed costs are spread across higher volumes, creating operating leverage.
• Contribution Margin: Estimated at 30–50% per aircraft ($50–55 million price less $25–35 million cost), though discounts reduce effective margins.
• Gross Profit Margin: 5–15% for commercial aircraft, improving with program maturity.
• EBITDA Margin: Not specified, but pressured by MAX grounding costs and supply chain investments. Services likely contribute higher margins.

Operating Leverage:

• High fixed costs (R&D, facilities) mean profitability scales with volume. At 42 737s per month, unit costs fall significantly, boosting margins.
• Supply chain disruptions and safety crises increase variable costs, eroding leverage.

FCF Drivers

• Net Income: Pressured by MAX grounding costs, 787 losses, and supply chain investments. Historical strength (pre-2018) driven by 737 and 777.
• Capex: Significant for new programs ($15–20 billion) and maintenance. The eVTOL investment ($450 million) is modest but reflects future bets.
• Net Working Capital (NWC): Predelivery payments reduce NWC needs, but supply chain fragility increases inventory and receivables days.
• Cash Conversion Cycle: Not specified, but likely lengthened by supply chain delays.

Capital Deployment

• M&A: Historical divestitures (e.g., Wichita and Tulsa units to Spirit AeroSystems) prioritized integration over vertical ownership. Recent eVTOL acquisition (Wisk) signals a bet on autonomy.
• Organic Growth: Investments in 737 MAX production and next-generation designs (e.g., transonic truss-braced wing).
• Buybacks: Not mentioned, but likely paused post-MAX crisis to preserve cash.

Market, Competitive Landscape, Strategy

Market Size and Growth

• Market Size: The global commercial aircraft market is driven by ~25,000–30,000 aircraft in service, with backlogs of 4,000–5,000 (Boeing) and 6,000–7,000 (Airbus). Emerging markets (China, India) are key growth drivers.
• Growth: Driven by volume (new routes, low-cost carriers) and price (fuel-efficient aircraft). Industry growth is tied to GDP, population growth, and air travel penetration.
• Environmental Pressures: Aviation contributes 2–3% of global carbon emissions, with sustainable aviation fuel (4–5x costlier) and new designs (e.g., truss-braced wing) addressing climate concerns.

Market Structure

• Duopoly: Boeing and Airbus dominate, with high barriers to entry (capital, expertise, sovereign backing). Minimum Efficient Scale (MES) is large, limiting competitors.
• New Entrants: COMAC’s C919 (China) and failed attempts (Bombardier, Mitsubishi) highlight entry challenges. China’s captive market may disrupt the duopoly long-term.
• Cyclicality: Demand fluctuates with economic cycles, impacting production rates and profitability.

Competitive Positioning

• Boeing’s Position: Leader in single-aisle (737 MAX) and long-haul (787, 777). Competes on fuel efficiency, reliability, and sovereign backing.
• Airbus Advantage: A320neo’s newer design and lack of MAX-like crises give Airbus an edge in single-aisle.
• Geopolitical Risks: China’s preference for COMAC and trade tensions threaten Boeing’s market share.

Market Share & Relative Growth

• Market Share: Boeing and Airbus each hold ~50% of the commercial market, with Boeing’s share pressured by MAX issues and China delays.
• Growth vs. Market: Boeing’s revenue growth lags the market due to production constraints, while Airbus benefits from stronger execution.

Competitive Forces (Hamilton’s 7 Powers)

1. Economies of Scale: High fixed costs and large MES create operating leverage, deterring new entrants. Boeing’s ability to spread costs over 42+ 737s per month is a key advantage.
2. Network Effects: Limited in aerospace, but Boeing’s installed base creates a flywheel of services revenue and customer lock-in.
3. Branding: Boeing’s reputation as a U.S. strategic asset supports sales, though MAX crises have damaged trust.
4. Counter-Positioning: Boeing’s focus on fuel efficiency and autonomy (eVTOL) differentiates it from Airbus, though execution risks remain.
5. Cornered Resource: Institutional knowledge and sovereign backing are unique assets, difficult for competitors to replicate.
6. Process Power: Boeing’s complex supply chain coordination is a strength, but recent fragility highlights vulnerabilities.
7. Switching Costs: High switching costs (training, maintenance) lock in customers, ensuring repeat orders.

Porter’s Five Forces:

• New Entrants: Low threat due to high barriers (capital, expertise, regulation).
• Substitutes: Low threat; air travel is irreplaceable for long-haul and time-sensitive routes.
• Supplier Power: Moderate; key suppliers (GE, Spirit) have leverage, but Boeing’s scale mitigates this.
• Buyer Power: Moderate; airlines negotiate discounts, but high switching costs limit leverage.
• Rivalry: High; Boeing and Airbus compete intensely on price, efficiency, and delivery timelines.

Strategic Logic

• Capex Bets: Investments in 737 MAX recovery, 777X, and next-generation designs (truss-braced wing, eVTOL) balance defensive (maintaining market share) and offensive (fuel efficiency, autonomy) strategies.
• Vertical Integration: Boeing’s shift to integration (post-McDonnell Douglas merger) reduced control over suppliers, increasing risks (e.g., Spirit AeroSystems’ financial troubles).
• Horizontal Expansion: Investments in autonomy (Wisk) and sustainable designs aim to capture future markets.
• M&A Risks: Divestitures have created supplier dependencies, while eVTOL acquisitions carry execution risks.

Key Takeaways and Dynamics

1. Unique Business Model Dynamics:
• Long-Term Relationships: Boeing’s 25–30-year customer relationships create high switching costs and recurring services revenue, a rare dynamic in manufacturing. This lock-in ensures backlog conversion and stable aftermarket income.
• Sovereign Backing: As a U.S. strategic asset, Boeing benefits from government support in sales campaigns, a unique advantage not replicable by smaller players.
• Cyclical Alignment: Boeing’s production rate alignment with demand cycles maximizes revenue during upswings but exposes it to volatility during downturns, unlike more stable industries.
• Services Stability: The services business (70% of lifecycle cost) provides a high-margin, counter-cyclical buffer, a critical differentiator from pure manufacturing models.
2. Financial Dynamics:
• Revenue Trajectory: The decline from $100 billion (2018) to $60 billion (2025 est.) reflects production disruptions (MAX, supply chain). Recovery hinges on scaling to 42+ 737s per month.
• Operating Leverage: High fixed costs (R&D, facilities) mean profitability scales with volume, but supply chain fragility increases variable costs, eroding margins.
• FCF Pressures: Historical strength (737, 777) has given way to pressures from MAX costs, 787 losses, and capex. Predelivery payments mitigate NWC needs, but delays hurt cash conversion.
• Capital Intensity: New programs ($15–20 billion) require massive upfront investment, with returns realized over decades, necessitating disciplined capital allocation.
3. Market and Competitive Dynamics:
• Duopoly Resilience: High barriers (capital, expertise, regulation) and switching costs protect Boeing’s position, but execution failures (MAX) and geopolitical risks (China) threaten share.
• Emerging Threats: China’s COMAC (C919) could disrupt the duopoly long-term, leveraging a captive market and sovereign backing.
• Environmental Pressures: Climate change (2–3% of emissions) drives demand for sustainable designs, with costlier fuels and new form factors (truss-braced wing) reshaping economics.
4. Strategic Challenges:
• Supply Chain Fragility: Coordination of thousands of suppliers is a core competency, but recent disruptions highlight vulnerabilities, impacting production and costs.
• Geopolitical Risks: China’s delays in MAX deliveries and preference for COMAC reflect trade tensions, a unique risk tied to Boeing’s strategic role.
• Cultural Shifts: Post-MAX, Boeing’s emphasis on safety (Chief Safety Officer, ombudsman) aims to rebuild trust, but strategic continuity suggests deeper cultural challenges persist.
5. Future Outlook:
• Execution is Key: Stabilizing production and resolving supply chain issues are critical to converting the 4,000–5,000 aircraft backlog into revenue.
• Innovation Bets: Investments in autonomy (eVTOL) and sustainable designs (truss-braced wing) position Boeing for future markets, but high costs and uncertain adoption pose risks.
• Geopolitical Navigation: Balancing U.S. support with China’s growing influence will shape Boeing’s global share.

Lessons for Investors and Operators

• Long-Term Capital Patience: Aerospace’s high capital intensity and long payback periods require disciplined allocation and tolerance for cyclical volatility, applicable to other capital-heavy industries (e.g., semiconductors).
• Supply Chain Resilience: Complex supply chains demand robust coordination and supplier partnerships, a lesson for manufacturing businesses reliant on global sourcing.
• Regulatory and Cultural Alignment: Safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable in regulated industries, requiring cultural commitment to quality over short-term financial gains.
• Strategic Asset Dynamics: Businesses tied to national interests benefit from unique support but face geopolitical risks, relevant to defense, energy, or tech sectors.

Boeing’s business model, rooted in long-term relationships, sovereign backing, and cyclical production, offers a compelling case study in balancing execution, innovation, and geopolitical navigation. Its challenges underscore the importance of operational stability and cultural alignment in sustaining competitive advantages in a high-stakes industry.