D.R. Horton: Building A New Model

Sector

Home-Builders

Background

Ed Wachenheim is the Founder of Greenhaven Associates. We cover what D.R. Horton's evolution from real estate business to homebuilder means for its balance sheet, the niche they've built around first-time homebuyers, and what the overall consolidation of the industry looks like.

Cover

Date

March 13, 2024

Episode Number

154

Background / Overview

History and Founding: D.R. Horton was founded in 1978 by Don Horton in Fort Worth, Texas. Starting with a single house built with $30,000 in borrowed capital, the company grew rapidly, building 20 houses in 1979, 40 in 1980, and 1,200 by 1992 when it went public with a 0.2% market share. Today, it operates in 118 markets across 33 states, with a focus on first-time homebuyers. The company has grown organically and through acquisitions, primarily acquiring land from distressed smaller builders rather than purchasing competitors at a premium. This roll-up strategy has allowed Horton to scale without significant goodwill on its balance sheet, unlike competitor Lennar, which carries $3 billion in goodwill from its CalAtlantic acquisition.

Category and Scale: D.R. Horton is a homebuilding company that has transitioned from a land-heavy real estate business to a high-volume, asset-light manufacturing business. It focuses on affordable single-family homes, with an average selling price of $375,000, lower than Lennar ($450,000) and Pulte ($550,000). The company builds approximately 90,000 homes annually, capturing a 12.5% market share of single-family home sales in 2023, up from 5.6% in 2013. It also has a smaller rental home segment, constituting about 10% of its business (approximately 8,000 homes per year).

Unique Business Model Dynamics: The most striking evolution in D.R. Horton’s business model is its shift to an asset-light, manufacturing-focused approach. Historically, homebuilders were land-intensive, holding 5-7 years of land inventory, which led to high leverage, low return on equity (ROE) below 10%, and limited free cash flow (FCF). This model resembled real estate companies that built houses, with capital tied up in land appreciating at modest rates (3-4% annually). The industry’s fragmentation, with thousands of small builders, further constrained efficiency.

D.R. Horton, inspired by NVR’s asset-light model, has transformed by optioning 75% of its land supply (up from 25% a decade ago). Optioning involves paying a premium (approximately 3% of gross margins) to control land without owning it, reducing capital intensity and risk. This shift has:

• Lowered debt: From $2.3 billion in net debt in 2013 to $600 million more cash than debt in 2023.
• Boosted ROE: From 10% in 2013 to 22% in 2023.
• Increased FCF: By minimizing land ownership, a larger portion of earnings converts to FCF, enabling share repurchasing and dividends.
• Reduced risk: Optioning allows Horton to walk away from undesirable land without significant losses, acting as a hedge.

Another unique dynamic is Horton’s speculative building model, where it builds homes on speculation (spec) rather than waiting for buyer contracts. Approximately 100% of Horton’s homes are built on spec, allowing for assembly-line efficiency. Subcontractors (e.g., plumbers, framers) move seamlessly between houses, reducing downtime and costs. This contrasts with the traditional model of custom builds, which are less efficient and require longer lead times. Horton mitigates spec risk by closely aligning construction pace with demand, slowing or accelerating based on market conditions and seasonal trends (e.g., the spring selling season starting in February).

Geographical Concentration: Horton’s operations are concentrated in high-growth regions, particularly the Southeast (e.g., Florida, Alabama), Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. These areas benefit from population growth and affordability compared to declining markets like California, Oregon, and Washington. This concentration aligns with secular tailwinds but exposes Horton to regional economic risks, though its broad presence across 33 states mitigates this.

Ownership / Fundraising / Recent Valuation

Ownership: D.R. Horton is a publicly traded company (NYSE: DHI) with no significant private equity or sponsor ownership mentioned. Don Horton, the founder, remains influential, maintaining a conservative approach to capital allocation.

Valuation: As of 2023, D.R. Horton’s stock trades at approximately 10x earnings, with earnings per share (EPS) of $13.82 in 2023 and projected at $14.50 in 2024. This compares to NVR, which trades at 16x earnings, and the S&P 500’s historical average of 16x earnings. The stock price is around $145, with a projected 2026 EPS of $18, implying a potential stock price of $288 at 16x earnings or $360 at 20x earnings. The company pays a dividend of $1.20 per share, yielding approximately 0.8%.

The valuation gap between Horton (10x) and NVR (16x) is notable, given Horton’s larger scale, faster market share growth (12.5% vs. NVR’s 3.1% in 2023), and comparable business model improvements. This suggests Horton is undervalued relative to its fundamentals and growth potential.

Key Products / Services / Value Proposition

Core Product: Single-Family Homes

• Description: Affordable single-family homes targeting first-time buyers, built in outlying areas with cheaper land. Average selling price is $375,000.
• Volume: Approximately 90,000 homes sold annually (2023 estimate).
• Revenue: Assuming 90,000 homes at $375,000, homebuilding revenue is approximately $33.75 billion.
• EBITDA Contribution: At a 16% operating margin, the homebuilding segment generates approximately $5.4 billion in EBITDA.

Secondary Product: Rental Homes

• Description: Homes built for institutional buyers (e.g., hedge funds) for rental purposes.
• Volume: Approximately 8,000 homes annually (10% of total production).
• Revenue: Assuming $375,000 per home, rental home revenue is approximately $3 billion.
• EBITDA Contribution: Likely similar margins (16%), contributing approximately $480 million to EBITDA.

Value Proposition

• Affordability: Targets first-time buyers with lower-priced homes compared to competitors.
• Efficiency: Spec building and scale allow cost advantages, enabling competitive pricing.
• Speed: Homes are built in approximately 4-6 months, meeting buyer demand for quick delivery.
• Reliability: Strong balance sheet and national presence ensure stability and access to resources (e.g., labor, materials).

Segments and Revenue Model

Segments

1. Homebuilding (90% of revenue): Construction and sale of single-family homes to individual buyers.
2. Rental Homes (10% of revenue): Construction of homes sold to institutional buyers for rental.
3. Other Operations: Minor activities (e.g., financial services, land development), not detailed but assumed to be negligible.

Revenue Model

• Homebuilding: Revenue is generated by selling homes at an average price of $375,000. Volume is driven by unit growth (projected at 8-10% annually) and market share gains. Pricing is constrained by affordability but expected to rise with inflation (2-4% annually) long-term.
• Rental Homes: Similar to homebuilding but sold in bulk to institutions, providing predictable revenue with potentially lower margins due to bulk pricing.
• Spec Building Dynamics: Homes are built on spec, sold before or during construction, with sales cycles aligned to seasonal demand (e.g., spring selling season). This model maximizes subcontractor efficiency and reduces lead times.

Splits and Mix

Product Mix

• Homebuilding: 90% of revenue, higher margin (16%).
• Rental Homes: 10% of revenue, likely similar margins but potentially lower due to institutional pricing.

Geographic Mix

• Concentrated in Southeast, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico, with declining presence in California, Oregon, and Washington. Exact revenue split by region is unavailable, but high-growth states drive volume.

Customer Mix

• First-Time Buyers: Primary target, seeking affordable homes ($375,000 average).
• Institutional Buyers: Growing but limited (5% of market, 10% of Horton’s business), driven by affordability constraints and rental demand.

Historical Mix Shifts

• Product: Increasing focus on spec building (nearly 100% of production) for efficiency.
• Geographic: Shift toward high-growth, affordable regions (e.g., Texas, Southeast) from high-cost areas (e.g., California).
• Customer: Growing institutional buyer segment, though still small (5% of market).

KPIs

• Unit Growth: 8-10% annually, driven by market share gains and industry recovery to 825,000 single-family homes (from 660,000 in 2023).
• Market Share: Increased from 5.6% (2013) to 12.5% (2023), with continued gains expected due to scale advantages.
• Gross Margin: 23.5% (2023), up from 21% pre-COVID, driven by scale and efficiencies.
• Operating Margin: 16% (5-year average), stable despite cost pressures.
• ROE: 22% (2023), up from 10% (2013), reflecting asset-light model.
• FCF: Over $3 billion projected for 2023, supporting buybacks ($1.5 billion) and dividends ($500 million).

Acceleration/Deceleration

• Acceleration: Market share gains (12.5% in 2023 vs. 8.4% in 2018) and unit growth (8-10%) indicate strong momentum. Regional bank constraints and supply shortages further disadvantage smaller builders, accelerating Horton’s growth.
• Deceleration: Affordability constraints (e.g., 6.75% mortgage rates) and potential interest rate spikes could temporarily dampen demand, though mitigated by long-term housing shortages (3-4 million units).

Headline Financials

Long-Term Financial Trends

• Revenue CAGR: Projected at 8-12% (8% unit growth + 2-4% price increases long-term).
• EBITDA Margin: Stable at 16%, with potential upside from further scale efficiencies.
• FCF Margin: High, with FCF exceeding $3 billion annually, driven by low capital intensity (inventory at $0.50 per $1 of revenue vs. $1 ten years ago).

Value Chain Position

Primary Activities

• Land Acquisition/Optioning: Controls land through options (75%) or purchases (25%), minimizing capital outlay.
• Home Construction: High-volume, spec-based manufacturing using subcontractors for efficiency.
• Sales and Marketing: Sells homes directly to buyers or institutions, leveraging model homes and incentives (e.g., interest rate buydowns).
• After-Sales: Limited aftermarket revenue (e.g., warranties), as home sales are one-time transactions.

Value Chain Position: D.R. Horton operates midstream in the housing value chain, between land developers (upstream) and homebuyers/institutions (downstream). By optioning land, Horton avoids upstream risks (e.g., land price volatility) and focuses on value-added manufacturing. Its competitive advantage lies in:

• Scale Economies: Lower costs (16% operating margin vs. 12% for midsized builders, <10% for small builders) due to subcontractor efficiency and bulk purchasing (e.g., 90,000 dishwashers annually from Whirlpool).
• Speed: .Version cycle (4-6 months) meets buyer demand for quick delivery.

Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy

• Direct Sales: Targets first-time buyers through model homes and incentives (e.g., carpet upgrades, mortgage rate buydowns).
• Institutional Sales: Sells rental homes in bulk to hedge funds, providing predictable revenue.
• Spec Building: Builds on spec to maximize efficiency, aligning construction with demand cycles.

Customers and Suppliers

Customers

• First-Time Buyers: Primary demographic, seeking affordable homes ($375,000) in suburban areas with good schools and amenities.
• Institutional Buyers: Hedge funds and real estate funds purchasing rental homes (5% of market, 10% of Horton’s business).
• Customer Dynamics: Affordability constraints drive demand for lower-priced homes and rentals. Incentives (e.g., rate buydowns) and parental support for deposits mitigate high mortgage rates.

Suppliers

• Land Developers/Banks: Provide land for optioning or purchase. Horton’s scale ensures preferential access.
• Subcontractors: Plumbers, framers, roofers, etc., benefit from Horton’s assembly-line model, reducing downtime.
• Material Suppliers: Whirlpool (appliances), lumber providers, etc. Horton’s bulk purchasing power secures better pricing and supply priority (e.g., transformers, refrigerators).
• Supplier Dynamics: Shortages (e.g., labor, transformers) disadvantage smaller builders, reinforcing Horton’s scale advantage.

Pricing

Contract Structure

• Homebuilding: Fixed-price contracts with buyers, typically completed in 4-6 months. Incentives (e.g., upgrades, rate buydowns) adjust effective pricing.
• Rental Homes: Bulk contracts with institutions, potentially at lower prices but with higher volume certainty.
• Optioning Costs: Optioning land reduces gross margins by ~3% but offsets interest expenses, maintaining net profitability.

Pricing Drivers

• Industry Fundamentals: Housing shortage (3-4 million units) supports stable pricing, though affordability limits near-term increases.
• Scale and Efficiency: Bulk purchasing and subcontractor efficiency allow competitive pricing.
• Customer Sensitivity: First-time buyers are price-sensitive, mitigated by incentives and lower-priced homes.
• Mission-Criticality: Housing is a necessity, ensuring demand resilience despite cyclicality.

Bottoms-Up Drivers

Revenue Model & Drivers

Revenue Model

• Homebuilding: Revenue = Units Sold × Average Selling Price ($375,000). Projected unit growth of 8-10% annually drives revenue, with pricing stable near-term and rising 2-4% long-term.
• Rental Homes: Similar model but sold in bulk to institutions, contributing ~10% of revenue.

Revenue Drivers

• Volume:
• Market Share Gains: Horton’s share grew from 5.6% (2013) to 12.5% (2023), driven by scale advantages and smaller builders’ struggles (e.g., financing, supply access).
• Industry Growth: Single-family home sales (660,000 in 2023) expected to recover to 825,000, supporting 8-10% unit growth.
• End-Market Demand: Housing shortage (3-4 million units) and population growth (1.1 million units/year) ensure long-term demand.
• Switching Costs: Low for buyers, but Horton’s affordability and speed attract first-time buyers.
• Pricing:
• Stable near-term due to affordability constraints (6.75% mortgage rates).
• Long-term increases of 2-4% tied to inflation.
• Incentives (e.g., rate buydowns costing 4% of gross margins) adjust effective pricing.
• Mix:
• Product: Homebuilding (90%) dominates, with rental homes (10%) growing but limited.
• Geographic: High-growth regions (Southeast, Texas) drive volume.
• Customer: First-time buyers remain core, with institutional buyers as a secondary segment.

Absolute Revenue

• 2023: ~$33.75 billion (90,000 homes × $375,000).
• 2024: ~$36.45 billion (8% growth, no price increase).
• CAGR: 8-12% (8% unit growth + 2-4% price growth long-term).

Cost Structure & Drivers

Cost Structure

• Variable Costs:
• Land: 10% of home price (raw) + 10% (development) = 20% total. Land costs are rising but offset by efficiencies.
• Materials: Stabilizing after 2021-2022 spikes, with bulk purchasing (e.g., Whirlpool appliances) reducing costs.
• Labor: Subcontractor costs stabilized, with Horton’s scale ensuring access and efficiency.
• Optioning Costs: ~3% of gross margins for land options, offset by lower interest expenses.
• Fixed Costs:
• SG&A: 7% of revenue (down from 9% pre-COVID), reflecting scale (90,000 homes vs. 40,000 historically).
• Overhead: Facilities, admin, marketing benefit from operating leverage.
• Contribution Margin: Varies by segment but supports 23.5% gross margin.
• Gross Margin: 23.5% (2023), up from 21% pre-COVID, driven by scale and efficiencies.
• EBITDA Margin: 16% (stable), with potential upside from further scale.

Cost Drivers

• Economies of Scale: Bulk purchasing and subcontractor efficiency reduce variable costs.
• Operating Leverage: Fixed costs (SG&A at 7%) decline as a percentage of revenue with growth.
• Inflation: Land costs rise, but efficiencies (e.g., assembly-line building) offset increases.
• Incremental Margin: High, as fixed costs are spread over more units, supporting stable 16% margins.

FCF Drivers

Net Income

• 2023 EPS: $13.82, implying net income of ~$4.5 billion (assuming ~325 million shares).
• 2024 EPS: $14.50, implying net income of ~$4.7 billion.

Capex

• Maintenance Capex: Minimal, as homebuilding is not capital-intensive.
• Growth Capex: Primarily land acquisition/optioning, with inventory at $0.50 per $1 of revenue (down from $1 in 2013).
• Capital Intensity: Low, with optioning reducing upfront capital needs.

Net Working Capital (NWC)

• Inventory: $0.50 per $1 of revenue, tied to homes under construction and land.
• Cash Conversion Cycle: Short (4-6 months from construction to sale), minimizing NWC needs.
• Seasonality: Higher NWC in spring (construction ramp-up), offset by year-end sales.

FCF

• 2023: >$3 billion, after accounting for inventory growth (~$1.35 billion for 8% revenue growth).
• Uses: $1.5 billion buybacks, $500 million dividends, with excess cash accumulating (>$1 billion projected for 2024).

Capital Deployment

Share Repurchasing

• 2023: $1.5 billion (~2-3% of shares), with potential to increase given excess cash.
• Timing: Heavier in Q4 due to stronger cash flows from year-end sales.
• Valuation: Opportunistic, with Horton buying back at 10x earnings, a low multiple.

Dividends

• $500 million annually ($1.20 per share), conservative payout to maintain flexibility.

M&A

• Minimal, focused on acquiring land from small builders at book value, avoiding goodwill.
• Potential for accelerated land purchases if regional bank constraints persist, leveraging excess cash.

Organic vs. Inorganic Growth

• Growth is primarily organic (8-10% unit growth), with inorganic growth limited to land acquisitions.

Market, Competitive Landscape, Strategy

Market Size and Growth

Market Size

• Total U.S. housing units: 145 million.
• Annual demand: 1.5 million units (1.1 million from population growth, 400,000 from replacements).
• Single-family homes: 660,000 sold in 2023, with a normalized level of 825,000.

Market Growth

• Volume: Expected to recover to 825,000 single-family homes, with capacity constraints limiting total starts to 1.6-1.7 million annually.
• Price: Stable near-term due to affordability, with 2-4% inflation-driven increases long-term.
• Absolute Growth: Housing shortage (3-4 million units) supports a 20-year runway, with demand exceeding supply.

Industry Growth Stack

• Population Growth: 0.7% annually (1.1 million units).
• Replacements: 400,000 units annually.
• Shortage Recovery: 200,000 units annually above normal demand, constrained by labor, materials, and permitting.

Key Drivers

• Housing shortage (3-4 million units).
• Population growth and demographic trends (e.g., delayed marriage/childbirth).
• Affordability constraints and mortgage rates (6.75% in 2023).

Market Structure

• Fragmented but Consolidating: Thousands of small builders historically, with the largest (Centex) holding 1% market share in the 1990s. Today, Horton (12.5%), Lennar, and Pulte dominate.
• Minimum Efficient Scale (MES): Large, requiring scale for subcontractor efficiency, bulk purchasing, and financing access. Smaller builders (<1,000 homes/year) struggle with margins below 10%.
• Competitors:
• Large: Lennar, Pulte, NVR (16% margins for Horton/Lennar, 12% for midsized).
• Midsized: Taylor Morrison, KB Homes, Meritage (12% margins).
• Small: Thousands of local builders, often unprofitable or exiting.
• Cycle Stage: Early recovery, with underbuilding (2007-2019) creating a shortage. Capacity constraints (labor, materials, permitting) limit supply growth.
• Traits: Cyclical but resilient due to necessity-driven demand. Regional bank constraints and supply shortages accelerate consolidation.

Competitive Positioning

• Matrix Positioning: Low-price, high-volume provider targeting first-time buyers, unlike Lennar/Pulte (higher price points) or NVR (asset-light, geographically concentrated).
• Risk of Disintermediation: Low, as large scale and manufacturing efficiency create barriers for new entrants.
• Market Share: 12.5% (2023), doubling from 5.6% (2013), outpacing NVR (3.1% in 2023).
• Relative Growth: Horton’s 8-10% unit growth exceeds market growth (660,000 to 825,000 single-family homes), driven by scale and consolidation.

Hamilton’s 7 Powers Analysis

1. Economies of Scale: Strong. Horton’s scale (90,000 homes vs. 1,000-2,000 for small builders) drives 16% margins vs. <10% for small competitors. Bulk purchasing and subcontractor efficiency create cost advantages.
2. Network Effects: Weak. Homebuilding lacks network effects, as buyers do not benefit from others’ purchases.
3. Branding: Moderate. Horton’s reputation for affordability and reliability supports demand, but homebuilding is less brand-driven than other industries.
4. Counter-Positioning: Strong. Asset-light model (75% optioned land) and spec building differentiate Horton from traditional land-heavy builders, with incumbents slow to adapt.
5. Cornered Resource: Moderate. Access to land, labor, and materials is secured through scale, but not exclusive. Relationships with subcontractors and suppliers provide an edge.
6. Process Power: Strong. Spec building and assembly-line efficiency (4-6 month build cycle) create cost and speed advantages, difficult for smaller builders to replicate.
7. Switching Costs: Weak. Buyers face low switching costs, but Horton’s affordability and availability attract first-time buyers.

Key Powers: Economies of Scale, Counter-Positioning, and Process Power are Horton’s primary competitive advantages, driving market share gains and profitability.

Strategic Logic

• Capex Cycle: Defensive, with optioning reducing upfront capital needs. Excess cash supports opportunistic land acquisitions.
• Economies of Scale: Horton operates at MES, with further scale improving margins and supplier access. Diseconomies are unlikely given focused operations.
• Vertical Integration: Limited, with optioning outsourcing land development to banks/developers, preserving capital.
• Horizontal Integration: Expanding into new markets (118 markets, 33 states) and rental homes (10% of business).
• M&A: Land-focused, avoiding goodwill-heavy acquisitions. Potential for accelerated growth if small builders exit.

Valuation and Investment Thesis

Current Valuation

• P/E: 10x (2023 EPS: $13.82; 2024 EPS: $14.50).
• Stock Price: ~$145 (2023).
• Dividend Yield: 0.8% ($1.20 per share).
• Market Cap: ~$47 billion (assuming 325 million shares).

Projected Valuation (2026)

• EPS: $18 (10% annual growth from $14.50).
• At 16x P/E: $288 (98% upside).
• At 20x P/E: $360 (148% upside).
• Dividend: $1.20, contributing minor returns.

Investment ThesisD.R. Horton is undervalued at 10x earnings, given its:

• Growth: 8-12% revenue CAGR (8% unit growth + 2-4% price increases), outpacing the S&P 500.
• Profitability: 16% margins, 22% ROE, and >$3 billion FCF reflect a superior business model.
• Balance Sheet: Net cash ($600 million in 2023) supports buybacks and opportunistic growth.
• Market Tailwinds: Housing shortage (3-4 million units) ensures demand, with capacity constraints favoring large builders.
• Competitive Advantage: Scale, asset-light model, and spec building drive market share gains (12.5% in 2023).

Risks

• Cyclicality: Interest rate spikes (e.g., 10%) could cause temporary demand shocks, though mitigated by necessity-driven demand.
• Regional Exposure: Concentration in Southeast and Texas risks regional downturns, though diversified across 33 states.
• Cost Pressures: Rising land costs (20% of home price) could pressure margins if efficiencies stall.

Key Takeaways and Dynamics

1. Asset-Light Transformation: Horton’s shift to 75% optioned land has reduced capital intensity, boosted ROE (22%), and increased FCF (>$3 billion), making it a manufacturing business rather than a real estate company.
2. Spec Building Efficiency: Building 100% on spec with a 4-6 month cycle maximizes subcontractor efficiency, yielding 16% margins vs. <10% for small builders.
3. Scale Advantage: Horton’s size (90,000 homes, 12.5% market share) secures supply chain priority and cost advantages, driving consolidation.
4. Housing Shortage Tailwind: A 3-4 million unit shortage ensures 20-year demand, with capacity constraints favoring large builders.
5. Conservative Capital Allocation: Excess cash ($600 million net cash) supports buybacks (2-3%) and dividends, with potential for accelerated land acquisitions.
6. Undervaluation: At 10x earnings vs. NVR’s 16x and the S&P 500’s 16x, Horton offers significant upside ($288-$360 by 2026).

Unique Dynamics

• Optioning as a Hedge: Optioning land (75%) reduces risk and capital needs, offsetting costs through lower interest expenses.
• Spec Building Flexibility: Aligning construction with demand (e.g., spring season) minimizes inventory risk while maximizing efficiency.
• Consolidation Opportunity: Regional bank constraints and supply shortages accelerate small builder exits, enabling Horton to acquire land at book value.

This breakdown highlights D.R. Horton’s evolution into a high-margin, capital-efficient manufacturer with strong growth prospects, underpinned by a resilient market and competitive advantages in scale and process. Its undervaluation presents a compelling investment opportunity.

Transcript