EssilorLuxottica: Sight To Behold

Sector

FashionRetail

Background

Swetha Ramachandran is the manager of the Artemis Leading Consumer Brands fund. We cover EssilorLuxottica's transformation through a series of strategic mergers and acquisitions, how achieving control of the entire value chain created its strongest competitive advantage, and the moves it's making to address the massive global opportunity in eye care.

Cover

Date

March 26, 2025

Episode Number

210

Background and Overview

EssilorLuxottica is the result of a strategic merger that combined Essilor’s expertise in prescription lenses with Luxottica’s dominance in branded frames and sunglasses. Essilor, founded in 1849 and known for innovations like the Varilux progressive lens (1959), focused on vision care, producing lenses for corrective eyewear. Luxottica, established in 1961, built a portfolio of iconic brands like Ray-Ban (acquired 1999 for $640 million), Oakley (2007 for $2.1 billion), and licensed luxury brands such as Chanel and Prada. The 2018 merger created a vertically integrated giant that controls the entire eyewear value chain, from R&D and manufacturing to retail via 18,000 stores, including LensCrafters and Sunglass Hut.

The company employs approximately 200,000 people and operates in 150 countries, with a product portfolio that includes 550 million prescription lenses annually and a wide range of frames and sunglasses. Its business is split 75% vision care (lenses) and 25% frames and sunglasses, reflecting the higher volume and profitability of lenses. EssilorLuxottica’s scale, with over 12,000 patents and 21,000 trademarks, and its open network model—selling both its own and competitors’ products—set it apart in a fragmented industry.

Ownership and Valuation

EssilorLuxottica is publicly listed on Euronext Paris, with a market capitalization of approximately €130 billion. The Del Vecchio family, through their holding company Delfin, owns just over 32% of the economic interest, exerting significant influence. The 2018 merger was structured as a merger of equals, though governance disputes between 2018 and 2021 highlighted tensions between the French (Essilor) and Italian (Luxottica) sides. These were resolved with a co-CEO structure, with Francesco Milleri (Luxottica) as CEO and Paul du Saillant (Essilor) as Deputy CEO.

The company’s valuation reflects its dominant market position and growth potential, particularly in emerging markets and innovative products like smart glasses. Recent speculation about a 5% stake by Meta underscores interest in its smart glasses partnership, though this remains unconfirmed. The 2019 acquisition of GrandVision for €7.1 billion, at a similar P/E multiple to EssilorLuxottica’s €50 billion market cap at the time, was dilutive but enhanced its retail footprint. The 2024 acquisition of Supreme for $1.5 billion raised eyebrows due to its lack of direct synergy with eyewear, though it may serve as a vehicle for smart glasses targeting younger demographics.

Key Products, Services, and Value Proposition

EssilorLuxottica’s portfolio spans two primary segments: vision care (lenses) and eyewear fashion (frames and sunglasses). Below is a breakdown of its key products and their value propositions:

1. Prescription Lenses (Vision Care, 75% of Revenue)
• Description: Includes corrective lenses, progressive lenses (e.g., Varilux), and specialized products like Stellest (to slow myopia progression in children) and Transitions (photochromic lenses).
• Volume: Produces 550 million lenses annually, enough for ~5% of the global population.
• Price: Average selling price (ASP) estimated at €200 per pair of glasses (lenses and frames), though lenses alone are lower.
• Value Proposition: High-margin, mission-critical products with strong brand loyalty due to innovation (e.g., 12,000 patents). The concentrated lens market (55% share) supports pricing stability, though not luxury-level pricing power.
• Revenue/EBITDA Contribution: Drives the majority of revenue and profitability due to scale and market dominance.
2. Frames and Sunglasses (Eyewear Fashion, 25% of Revenue)
• Description: Includes owned brands like Ray-Ban, Oakley, Persol, Oliver Peoples, and licensed luxury brands (Chanel, Prada). Recent additions include Supreme (2024).
• Volume: Lower than lenses due to higher ASPs and discretionary nature.
• Price: Ranges from affordable (€100–€200 for Ray-Ban) to luxury (up to €500+ for licensed brands).
• Value Proposition: Brand-driven, fashion-oriented products with strong consumer recognition. Ray-Ban alone generates over €3 billion annually. The fragmented frames market (33% share) is more competitive, with a long tail of smaller players.
• Revenue/EBITDA Contribution: Lower margins than lenses due to fragmentation and brand-led competition.
3. Smart Glasses (Emerging, Ray-Ban Meta)
• Description: Launched in 2023 with Meta AI integration, offering features like virtual try-ons and AI-powered functionality.
• Volume: Sold 2 million units in 2023, with capacity to reach 10 million.
• Price: ~$300 per pair, positioned as affordable to drive adoption.
• Value Proposition: Combines EssilorLuxottica’s design and distribution with Meta’s AI, targeting mass-market adoption. First-mover advantage in a $3 billion market (vs. $34 billion for smartwatches).
• Revenue/EBITDA Contribution: Small but growing, with potential to reshape the total addressable market (TAM).
4. Hearing Solutions (Nuance Audio, Emerging)
• Description: Glasses-based hearing aids for mild-to-moderate hearing loss, launched in 2024 via Nuance technology.
• Volume: Early stage, no data provided.
• Price: Estimated at ~$1,500 (OTC in the US).
• Value Proposition: Addresses aging populations and stigma around traditional hearing aids, leveraging EssilorLuxottica’s retail network.
• Revenue/EBITDA Contribution: Negligible currently but a potential growth driver.

Segments and Revenue Model

EssilorLuxottica operates two primary segments, treated as economically separable units due to distinct market dynamics and profitability profiles:

1. Vision Care (Lenses)
• Revenue Model: High-volume sales of prescription lenses, driven by necessity (over 4 billion people need corrective eyewear). Contracts with independent eye care providers and insurance coverage stabilize demand. Aftermarket services (e.g., lens replacements) enhance stickiness.
• Market Share: ~55%, with competitors like Hoya and Carl Zeiss in a concentrated oligopoly.
• Pricing: Moderate pricing power due to innovation and scale, though not luxury-level. ASPs are lower than frames but stable.
• Volume Drivers: Aging population, rising myopia (projected to affect 5 billion by 2050), and under-penetration in emerging markets (e.g., Asia, where 90% of vision issues are undiagnosed).
2. Eyewear Fashion (Frames and Sunglasses)
• Revenue Model: Brand-driven sales of frames and sunglasses, with a mix of owned and licensed brands. Discretionary purchases make this segment more cyclical. Retail channels (e.g., Sunglass Hut) and eCommerce (7% of sales) drive distribution.
• Market Share: ~33%, with Kering Eyewear (10%) and Safilo (7%) as key competitors in a fragmented market. A 40% long tail of smaller players adds competition.
• Pricing: Varies widely by brand, with Ray-Ban at accessible price points and luxury brands commanding premiums. Price elasticity is higher due to substitutes.
• Volume Drivers: Brand strength, fashion trends, and affordable luxury positioning (e.g., “lipstick effect” during recessions).

Revenue Splits and Mix

• Channel Mix: 59% of revenue comes from independent eye care providers, with the rest from owned retail (18,000 stores) and eCommerce (7%). North America relies heavily on independents (over 50%), while Asia Pacific leans toward brick-and-mortar and eCommerce.
• Geo Mix: North America (35% of revenue), EMEA (40%, split between developed and emerging Europe), and Asia Pacific (~25%). Asia offers the highest growth potential due to myopia prevalence.
• Customer Mix: Broad, ranging from children needing corrective lenses to fashion-conscious adults buying sunglasses.
• Product Mix: 75% lenses, 25% frames/sunglasses. Smart glasses and hearing aids are emerging but small.
• End-Market Mix: Vision care is necessity-driven (stable), while frames/sunglasses are discretionary (cyclical).
• EBITDA Contribution: Lenses contribute disproportionately to EBITDA due to higher margins and market concentration.

Mix Shifts

• Historical: Post-merger, lenses have remained the dominant revenue driver, with frames/sunglasses stable at 25%. Retail and eCommerce have grown, with eCommerce rising to 7% of sales.
• Forecasted: Increased penetration in Asia Pacific, driven by myopia, could boost lens volumes. Smart glasses may grow the frames segment if adoption scales (e.g., 10 million units). Hearing aids could add a new revenue stream but remain speculative.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

• Revenue Growth: High-single-digit growth (~7–8% CAGR), driven by volume (lens demand in emerging markets) and modest price increases.
• EBITDA Margin: ~16% (EBIT margin), targeted to reach 19–20% by 2026, though growth investments may delay this.
• Gross Margin: Stable at 63–64%, reflecting moderate pricing power and scale efficiencies.
• CapEx: 5–7% of sales, split between operations (33%), retail (33%), and digital (20%).
• eCommerce Penetration: 7% of sales, growing due to digital investments.
• Smart Glasses Sales: 2 million units in 2023, with capacity for 10 million.
• Penetration Rate: Reaches ~113 million consumers annually (at €200 ASP), with significant upside in emerging markets where myopia is under-addressed.

Acceleration/Deceleration

• Acceleration: Lens volumes in Asia, smart glasses adoption, and eCommerce growth signal accelerating demand.
• Deceleration: Frames/sunglasses face cyclical risks, and margin expansion may lag due to reinvestment.

Headline Financials

Long-Term Financial Trends

• Revenue: Steady growth (~7–8% CAGR) driven by lens volumes and emerging markets. Smart glasses and hearing aids could accelerate growth if successful.
• EBITDA Margin: Stable at 16%, with potential for expansion to 19–20% if operating leverage improves. However, reinvestment in growth (e.g., smart glasses, retail) may delay margin gains.
• FCF: Capital-light model (low maintenance CapEx) supports positive FCF, but growth CapEx (5–7% of sales) and working capital cycles (e.g., inventory for retail) reduce cash conversion.

Value Chain Position

EssilorLuxottica operates across the entire eyewear value chain, a key differentiator:

• Primary Activities:
• R&D: Develops proprietary lens technologies (e.g., Varilux, Stellest) and smart glasses (Ray-Ban Meta). Over 12,000 patents and 2,000 patent families.
• Manufacturing: Produces 550 million lenses and millions of frames annually, leveraging scale for cost efficiencies.
• Distribution: Controls global distribution through 18,000 retail stores (e.g., LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut) and partnerships with independent eye care providers.
• Retail: Owns the consumer experience via retail and eCommerce (7% of sales), offering both its own and competitors’ products.
• Value Chain Position: Fully integrated from upstream (R&D, manufacturing) to downstream (retail). This contrasts with competitors like Warby Parker (design and retail only) or Hoya (lenses only). Vertical integration enables cost control, quality assurance, and direct consumer access.
• Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy: Multi-channel approach combining owned retail, eCommerce, and independent eye care providers. The open network model (selling competitors’ products) enhances scale and consumer choice, unlike closed systems (e.g., Zara).
• Competitive Advantage: Scale, vertical integration, and proprietary IP create barriers to entry. The ability to reinvest in R&D and retail while maintaining moderate margins differentiates it from fragmented competitors.

Customers and Suppliers

• Customers:
• Vision Care: Broad demographic, including children (myopia correction), adults, and aging populations needing progressive lenses. Mission-critical purchases ensure stable demand.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Fashion-conscious consumers, skewed toward higher-income groups for luxury brands. Affordable luxury (e.g., Ray-Ban) broadens appeal.
• Smart Glasses: Tech-savvy, younger consumers (Gen Z for Supreme).
• Retention: High in lenses due to necessity and insurance coverage; moderate in frames/sunglasses due to brand loyalty and discretionary nature.
• Suppliers:
• Raw materials (e.g., plastic, glass) are commoditized, with EssilorLuxottica’s scale enabling bulk purchasing efficiencies.
• Dependency on Meta for AI in smart glasses introduces partnership risk, though economics are undisclosed.
• No significant supplier concentration, reducing supplier power.

Pricing

• Contract Structure: Lenses are sold through long-term contracts with independent eye care providers and insurance plans, ensuring visibility and stability. Frames/sunglasses are sold via retail and wholesale, with shorter cycles due to fashion trends.
• Pricing Drivers:
• Lenses: Innovation (e.g., Stellest, Transitions) and market concentration support moderate pricing power. Price elasticity is low due to necessity.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Brand strength and perceived quality drive pricing, but fragmentation and substitutes limit power. ASPs range from €100 (Ray-Ban) to €500+ (luxury).
• Smart Glasses: Affordable pricing ($300) to drive adoption, balancing volume and margin.
• Hearing Aids: Premium pricing ($1,500) reflects proprietary technology and niche market.
• Price Elasticity: Low for lenses (mission-critical); higher for frames/sunglasses (discretionary). Smart glasses face competition risk if functionality lags.

Bottoms-Up Drivers

Revenue Model and Drivers

How EssilorLuxottica Makes $1 of Revenue:

• Vision Care (75¢): Sells high-volume prescription lenses (~550 million annually) at a blended ASP of ~€100–€150 (estimated). Revenue is driven by necessity, insurance coverage, and under-penetration in emerging markets (e.g., Asia, where myopia affects billions). Aftermarket lens replacements add stickiness.
• Frames/Sunglasses (25¢): Sells branded frames and sunglasses at ASPs of €100–€500, with Ray-Ban as the volume leader (€3 billion+ annually). Revenue is driven by brand loyalty, fashion trends, and affordable luxury positioning.
• Emerging (Smart Glasses, Hearing Aids): Small but growing, with smart glasses at $300 ASP and hearing aids at $1,500. Volume-driven growth depends on adoption.

Revenue Drivers:

• Price:
• Lenses: Stable pricing due to innovation and oligopolistic market.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Mix-driven (luxury vs. affordable) with moderate elasticity.
• Smart Glasses: Low pricing to drive volume, with potential for premium tiers.
• Volume:
• Lenses: Aging population, myopia growth (5 billion by 2050), and emerging market penetration.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Brand strength, retail expansion, and eCommerce growth (7% of sales).
• Smart Glasses: First-mover advantage, with 2 million units sold and 10 million capacity.
• Mix: Lenses dominate (75%), but smart glasses could shift mix toward frames if adoption scales. Asia Pacific is growing faster than North America/EMEA.
• Organic vs. Inorganic: Organic growth (~7–8%) from volume and price; inorganic from acquisitions (e.g., GrandVision, Supreme).

Absolute Revenue: €26.5 billion, with lenses (€19.9 billion) and frames/sunglasses (€6.6 billion). Smart glasses and hearing aids are immaterial but growing.

Cost Structure and Drivers

Cost Structure:

• Variable Costs:
• COGS: Raw materials (plastic, glass) and labor for lens and frame production. Scale and bulk purchasing keep costs low.
• Contribution Margin: Higher for lenses due to concentrated market and innovation; lower for frames due to competition.
• Gross Margin: 63–64%, stable over five years, reflecting moderate pricing power and scale efficiencies.
• Fixed Costs:
• Selling Expenses: 50% of gross margin (€8.4 billion), driven by 18,000 retail stores and 200,000 employees.
• Advertising: 7% of sales (€1.86 billion), focused on brand competition in frames/sunglasses.
• G&A: 8% of sales (€2.12 billion), high due to global operations and integration complexity.
• R&D: 2% of sales (€0.53 billion), low but outspending 75% of the industry.
• Operating Leverage: High fixed costs (retail, G&A) offer leverage as revenue grows, but reinvestment (e.g., smart glasses, eCommerce) delays margin expansion.

Cost Trends:

• % of Revenue: Selling (32%), advertising (7%), G&A (8%), R&D (2%). Fixed costs are ~47% of revenue, variable ~37%.
• % of Total Costs: Selling (50%), COGS (36%), G&A (12%), advertising (11%), R&D (~3%).
• Drivers: Retail expansion, digital investments, and brand competition drive fixed costs. Inflation in raw materials and labor is mitigated by scale.

EBITDA Margin: 16% (EBIT), with potential to reach 19–20% by 2026 if fixed costs decline as a % of revenue. Incremental margins depend on smart glasses adoption and retail productivity.

FCF Drivers

• Net Income: Not provided, but EBIT of €3.5 billion suggests positive net income after interest and taxes.
• CapEx: €1.3–1.9 billion (5–7% of sales), split between maintenance (operations) and growth (retail, digital). Capital intensity is moderate.
• NWC: Retail-driven inventory and receivables cycles reduce cash conversion. No specific data on days outstanding.
• FCF: Likely positive but constrained by high CapEx and NWC needs. Cash conversion cycle is moderate due to retail and global operations.

Capital Deployment

• M&A: GrandVision (€7.1 billion, 2019) enhanced retail; Supreme ($1.5 billion, 2024) targets younger demographics. Historical acquisitions (Ray-Ban, Oakley) were transformative.
• Organic Growth: Investments in smart glasses, hearing aids, eCommerce (7% of sales), and retail expansion.
• Buybacks/Dividends: Not discussed, but family ownership suggests reinvestment priority.
• Synergies: GrandVision added retail scale; Supreme’s value depends on smart glasses integration.

Market, Competitive Landscape, and Strategy

Market Size and Growth

• Market Size: The global eyewear market is estimated at €100–€150 billion, with lenses (€70–€100 billion) larger than frames/sunglasses (~€30–€50 billion). Smart glasses are ~$3 billion, with potential to grow toward smartwatches ($34 billion).
• Growth:
• Lenses: Mid-single-digit growth (~5–7%), driven by volume (aging population, myopia) and modest price increases.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Low-single-digit growth (~3–5%), with cyclical sensitivity.
• Smart Glasses: High-double-digit growth, with 2 million units sold in 2023.
• Industry Growth Stack: Population growth (+1%), rising incomes in emerging markets (+3–5%), myopia prevalence (+5–7%), and innovation (smart glasses, hearing aids).
• 3 KDs (Key Drivers): Aging population, emerging market penetration, and technological innovation.

Market Structure

• Lenses: Oligopolistic, with EssilorLuxottica (55%), Hoya, and Carl Zeiss dominating. Minimum efficient scale (MES) is high due to R&D and manufacturing costs, limiting competitors.
• Frames/Sunglasses: Fragmented, with EssilorLuxottica (33%), Kering (10%), Safilo (7%), and a 40% long tail. Lower MES allows smaller players, increasing competition.
• Smart Glasses: Emerging, with EssilorLuxottica/Meta as first movers. Apple and others (e.g., Sesame) pose future threats.
• Traits: Regulation (e.g., EU concessions for GrandVision), macro factors (recessions impact frames), and innovation cycles drive dynamics.

Competitive Positioning

• Matrix: EssilorLuxottica spans low-cost lenses to luxury frames, targeting both necessity and fashion markets. Warby Parker focuses on mid-range, digital-first retail; Kering and Safilo target luxury and mid-market frames.
• Disintermediation Risk: Low due to vertical integration and scale. DTC players like Warby Parker struggle with profitability (2% of EssilorLuxottica’s sales).
• MES: High in lenses (R&D, manufacturing); moderate in frames (branding, retail). EssilorLuxottica’s scale exceeds MES, deterring new entrants.

Market Share and Relative Growth

• Lenses: 55% share, growing in line with market (~5–7%).
• Frames/Sunglasses: 33% share, growing slightly below market (~3–5%) due to fragmentation.
• Smart Glasses: Leading share in a nascent market, with 2 million units sold vs. negligible competition.
• Relative Growth: Outpacing market in lenses and smart glasses; in line or slightly below in frames/sunglasses.

Competitive Forces (Hamilton’s 7 Powers)

1. Economies of Scale: Strong. EssilorLuxottica’s scale (550 million lenses, 18,000 stores) lowers unit costs and enables R&D investment (2% of sales outspends 75% of industry). High MES in lenses deters entrants.
2. Network Effects: Weak. No direct network effects, but retail scale and open network (selling competitors’ products) create a virtuous cycle of distribution.
3. Branding: Strong. Ray-Ban, Oakley, and licensed brands (Chanel, Prada) command loyalty and premium pricing. Supreme targets Gen Z.
4. Counter-Positioning: Moderate. Vertical integration counters DTC models (e.g., Warby Parker) by controlling the entire value chain, making it hard for competitors to replicate without scale.
5. Cornered Resource: Strong. Over 12,000 patents and proprietary technologies (e.g., Varilux, Stellest, Nuance) provide exclusive capabilities.
6. Process Power: Strong. Manufacturing efficiencies, retail operations, and digital innovations (e.g., virtual try-ons) enhance performance.
7. Switching Costs: Moderate. Lenses have moderate switching costs due to insurance contracts and brand loyalty; frames/sunglasses have lower costs due to substitutes.

Porter’s Five Forces:

• New Entrants: Low threat in lenses (high MES, patents); moderate in frames (lower MES, fragmentation).
• Substitutes: Low for lenses (necessity); moderate for frames/sunglasses (fashion alternatives).
• Supplier Power: Low due to commoditized inputs and scale.
• Buyer Power: Moderate. Independent eye care providers have some leverage, but retail and insurance reduce end-consumer power.
• Rivalry: High in frames/sunglasses (fragmented); moderate in lenses (oligopoly).

Strategic Logic

• CapEx Bets: Offensive investments in smart glasses, hearing aids, and eCommerce to capture new markets. Defensive investments in retail maintain dominance.
• Economies of Scale: Achieved MES in lenses and retail, with potential diseconomies (e.g., G&A bloat at 8% of sales) if complexity grows.
• Vertical Integration: Reduces costs and enhances quality, enabling direct consumer access. Open network model differentiates it from closed systems.
• Horizontal Expansion: Supreme acquisition targets younger demographics; smart glasses and hearing aids expand into adjacencies.
• Geo Expansion: Asia Pacific is a priority due to myopia prevalence and under-penetration.
• M&A: Disciplined approach (e.g., walked away from Safilo in 2009) ensures value creation. Supreme’s success hinges on smart glasses integration.

Key Dynamics and Unique Aspects of the Business Model

EssilorLuxottica’s business model is distinguished by several unique dynamics:

1. Vertical Integration Across the Value Chain
• Unlike competitors who focus on specific segments (e.g., Warby Parker on retail/design, Hoya on lenses), EssilorLuxottica controls R&D, manufacturing, distribution, and retail. This enables cost efficiencies, quality control, and direct consumer access, reducing reliance on third parties.
• The GrandVision acquisition (2019) completed its retail footprint, particularly in Europe, where Essilor previously lacked direct-to-consumer channels.
• Vertical integration supports moderate margins (16% EBIT) in a fragmented industry, contrasting with DTC players like Warby Parker, which struggle to achieve profitability.
2. Open Network Model
• EssilorLuxottica’s retail stores sell both its own brands and competitors’ products (e.g., Hoya, Kering Eyewear), creating a unique open network. This contrasts with closed systems like Zara and enhances scale by attracting a broader customer base.
• Competitors like Hoya and Kering are also clients, reinforcing EssilorLuxottica’s dominance as a distribution hub. This dynamic strengthens its bargaining power and market reach.
3. Dual Market Exposure (Necessity vs. Discretionary)
• The 75/25 split between lenses and Frames/sunglasses balances stable, necessity-driven revenue (lenses) with cyclical, brand-driven revenue (frames). Lenses benefit from insurance coverage and aging populations, while frames leverage affordable luxury and fashion trends.
• This duality mitigates risk, as seen during the global financial crisis when lens sales grew while sunglasses declined moderately.
4. Scale as a Competitive Moat
• Producing 550 million lenses annually and operating 18,000 stores creates unmatched scale, enabling bulk purchasing, R&D investment (outspending 75% of the industry), and retail productivity.
• Scale deters new entrants in lenses, where MES is high, and supports moderate pricing power despite fragmentation in frames.
5. Innovation-Led Growth
• Over 12,000 patents and proprietary technologies (e.g., Varilux, Stellest, Nuance) drive differentiation in lenses and emerging categories like smart glasses and hearing aids.
• The Ray-Ban Meta partnership (2 million units sold in 2023) positions EssilorLuxottica as a first mover in a $3 billion smart glasses market, with potential to redefine the TAM.
• Hearing aids (Nuance) target aging populations, leveraging retail scale to address stigma and accessibility.
6. Emerging Market Optionality
• Under-penetration in Asia, where 90% of vision issues are undiagnosed, offers significant growth potential. Myopia prevalence (projected to affect 5 billion by 205 6. Global Scale: Operating in 150 countries with 18,000 stores and 200,000 employees enables EssilorLuxottica to capture global demand, particularly in high-growth regions like Asia Pacific.

What Stands Out from the Interviewee

• Vertical Integration as the “Secret Sauce”: Swetha emphasizes that EssilorLuxottica’s control of the entire value chain—from R&D to retail—is its key differentiator, enabling scale, cost efficiencies, and consumer access. This contrasts with competitors’ partial models (e.g., Warby Parker’s retail focus).
• Open Network Model: The ability to sell competitors’ products in its stores is a unique dynamic, enhancing scale and consumer choice while reinforcing its distribution dominance.
• Smart Glasses Potential: The Ray-Ban Meta partnership is a game-changer, with 2 million units sold and capacity for 10 million, potentially reshaping the TAM and justifying acquisitions like Supreme.
• Moderate Pricing Power: Swetha notes that gross margins (63–64%) are stable but not luxury-level, reflecting moderate pricing power due to fragmentation and substitutes, particularly in frames/sunglasses.
• Governance Lessons: The 2018–2021 governance disputes highlight the risks of cultural misalignment in mergers, impacting morale and share price.
• Long-Term Vision: The Del Vecchio family’s disciplined, long-term approach (e.g., transforming Ray-Ban over 15 years) underscores the value of family control in enabling bold bets.

Valuation and Market Overview

Market Overview:

• The eyewear market is large (€100–€150 billion) and growing (5–7%), driven by aging populations, myopia prevalence, and emerging market penetration. Lenses dominate due to necessity, while frames/sunglasses are fashion-driven and cyclical. Smart glasses ($3 billion) and hearing aids are nascent but high-growth.
• EssilorLuxottica’s 55% share in lenses and 33% in frames/sunglasses make it the market leader, with scale and vertical integration as key advantages. Competitors like Warby Parker (2% of sales) and Kering/Safilo lack its breadth.
• Risks include cyclicality in frames, tariff impacts, and competition in smart glasses (e.g., Apple, Sesame).

Valuation:

• At €130 billion market cap, EssilorLuxottica trades at a premium reflecting its dominance, growth (~7–8% CAGR), and smart glasses potential.
• The GrandVision acquisition (€7.1 billion) was at a similar P/E to its €50 billion market cap in 2019, suggesting fair pricing. Supreme ($1.5 billion) is speculative but aligns with smart glasses strategy.
• EBIT margins (16%, targeting 19–20%) and stable gross margins (63–64%) support a growth-driven valuation, though reinvestment may delay FCF growth.

Conclusion

EssilorLuxottica’s business model is a masterclass in vertical integration, leveraging scale, innovation, and an open network to dominate the eyewear industry. Its 75/25 lens-to-frame split balances stable, necessity-driven revenue with cyclical, brand-driven growth, while emerging categories like smart glasses and hearing aids offer upside. Key dynamics—vertical integration, open distribution, dual market exposure, and emerging market optionality—create a defensible moat, reinforced by Hamilton’s 7 Powers (scale, branding, cornered resources, process power). Financially, €26.5 billion in revenue, 16% EBIT margins, and moderate capital intensity support growth, though reinvestment delays margin expansion. Risks include governance complexity, cyclicality in frames, and smart glasses competition, but EssilorLuxottica’s scale and innovation position it to capture the growing eyewear market, particularly in Asia.

Transcript