Graco: Mastering The Flow

Sector

Industrials

Background

Aaron Wasserman is the Managing Partner at Third Period Capital. We cover the diverse applications of Graco's fluid handling systems, how the company keeps track of 70,000 SKUs, and how it kept its culture intact while growing rapidly.

Cover

Date

August 14, 2024

Episode Number

178

Business Breakdown: Graco, Inc.

Background / Overview

Graco, founded in 1926 by brothers Leil and Russell Gray in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is a leading manufacturer of fluid-handling equipment. Initially focused on creating a better grease gun for automotive lubrication, Graco has evolved into a global leader in systems that move, measure, control, dispense, and spray fluids and powders. Its products serve diverse applications, from painting homes to spraying flavor coatings on Doritos, gluing shoe soles, and lubricating heavy machinery. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Graco employs a workforce that generates approximately $550,000 in revenue per employee, reflecting high operational efficiency. The company operates in over 100 countries through third-party distributors, selling around 70,000 SKUs. With a market capitalization of $13 billion, Graco is a niche industrial player known for its robust financial performance and disciplined capital allocation.

Ownership / Fundraising / Recent Valuation

Graco is a publicly traded company (NYSE: GGG) with a market cap of approximately $13 billion. The transcript does not provide recent transaction details, such as enterprise values (EVs) or multiples for acquisitions, but it notes a historical share repurchase from the Gray family in the late 1980s or 1990s at 16x earnings, and another 5% buyback in the mid-2000s at a similar multiple. The company maintains a conservative balance sheet with minimal financial leverage, holding significant cash reserves rather than relying on debt. The stock currently trades at around 20x earnings, reflecting a premium valuation due to its high-quality business model. Insiders own a relatively small portion of the stock, which raises the risk of a potential acquisition by a larger industrial conglomerate at a premium (e.g., 46%).

Key Products / Services / Value Proposition

Graco’s core value proposition lies in providing productivity-enhancing fluid-handling solutions that improve efficiency and reliability for customers. Its products are mission-critical in industrial settings and offer high return on investment (ROI) for users, such as contractors who can paint two homes in a day instead of one using a Graco sprayer. The product portfolio includes:

• Paint Sprayers: High-end sprayers ($2,500–$3,000) for professional contractors, offering reliability, serviceability, and user loyalty compared to competitors like Wagner’s lower-priced ($1,000) alternatives.
• Industrial Pumps and Systems: Used in manufacturing for dispensing fluids like adhesives, lubricants, or coatings (e.g., oil sprayers for Doritos production). These systems can cost tens of thousands of dollars and are customized for niche applications.
• Aftermarket Parts: Critical for maintaining systems handling corrosive fluids (e.g., paint, likened to “liquid sandpaper”). Aftermarket revenue is 5–6x the initial system cost over its lifetime, driving high-margin recurring revenue.

The value proposition is threefold: (1) Productivity: Enabling faster, more efficient processes (e.g., painting, manufacturing); (2) Reliability: High-quality, durable products with lower breakdown rates; and (3) Serviceability: Extensive aftermarket support and rapid delivery of parts, ensuring minimal downtime for customers.

Segments and Revenue Model

Graco operates two primary segments, though not explicitly delineated in the transcript as separate reporting units:

1. Contractor Segment (B2C/B2B Hybrid):
• Description: Sells paint sprayers and smaller fluid-handling tools to professional contractors and DIYers through retailers like Home Depot (8% of revenue) and Sherwin-Williams.
• Revenue Model: One-time system sales (e.g., $2,500–$3,000 sprayers) plus recurring aftermarket parts. This segment faces more competition (e.g., Wagner) and has lower margins due to automated manufacturing and competitive pricing.
• Customer Mix: Professional contractors (primary) and DIYers (smaller portion).
2. Industrial Segment (B2B):
• Description: Provides complex, customized fluid-handling systems for industrial applications (e.g., food production, semiconductor manufacturing, automotive). Systems can cost tens of thousands of dollars.
• Revenue Model: High-margin system sales and significant aftermarket revenue (5–6x system cost). This segment has less competition due to customization and niche expertise.
• Customer Mix: Large manufacturers (e.g., Pepsi for Doritos production).

Revenue Breakdown:

• New Systems/Products: ~60% of revenue ($1.32 billion).
• Aftermarket Parts/Accessories: ~40% of revenue ($0.88 billion).
• Channel Mix: Home Depot accounts for 8% of revenue, with the majority through third-party distributors in 100 countries.

Revenue Model Dynamics:

• Razor-Razorblade Model: Initial system sales (“razors”) generate recurring aftermarket revenue (“razorblades”), which is 5–6x the system cost over its lifetime. This creates a sticky, high-margin revenue stream.
• Pricing Power: Graco commands premium pricing (e.g., 2% annual price increases) due to reliability, user loyalty, and mission-critical applications. For example, a $100,000 pump in a Doritos production line is a small but essential part of a larger process, reducing price sensitivity.
• Volume Drivers: Growth comes from industrial production growth (3%), new product introductions (1%), and acquisitions targeting niche applications (e.g., semiconductor production).

Splits and Mix

• Product Mix: 60% new systems, 40% aftermarket parts. The aftermarket is higher-margin, contributing disproportionately to profitability.
• Channel Mix: Predominantly third-party distributors (92%+), with Home Depot at 8%. Distributors earn healthy margins, incentivizing strong service and inventory management.
• Geo Mix: Sales in 100 countries, though specific geographic revenue splits are not provided. Growth opportunities exist in high-wage or rising-wage countries where productivity solutions are in demand.
• Customer Mix: Split between contractors (B2C/B2B hybrid) and industrial manufacturers (B2B). Industrial customers are stickier due to mission-critical applications.
• End-Market Mix: Diverse, including construction, food production, semiconductors, automotive, and more. No single end-market dominates, reducing concentration risk.

Historical Mix Shifts:

• Aftermarket Growth: The aftermarket has grown as a percentage of revenue due to the installed base’s longevity and corrosive fluid wear, driving higher-margin contributions.
• Vitality Index Decline: Historically, 30% of revenue came from products introduced in the prior three years, but this has fallen, indicating lower returns on new product development.

KPIs

• Revenue per Employee: $550,000, doubled over 15–20 years, indicating best-in-class efficiency.
• Vitality Index: Previously 30%+, now lower (exact figure undisclosed), signaling potential challenges in new product innovation.
• Inventory Turns: High turns due to Graco holding inventory centrally, reducing distributor burden and enabling fast delivery (40%–50% of orders are aftermarket parts).
• Organic Growth: ~6% annually (3% industrial production, 2% pricing, 1% new products).
• Aftermarket Revenue Multiple: 5–6x initial system cost, a key driver of recurring revenue.

Headline Financials

Long-Term Financial Trends:

• Revenue: Consistent 6% organic growth, driven by industrial production (3%), pricing (2%), and new products (1%). Acquisitions have contributed less in recent years.
• EBITDA Margin: Stable at ~30%, reflecting operating leverage from fixed cost control and high-margin aftermarket revenue.
• FCF: Nearly matches net income due to low CapEx (3%–5% of revenue) and efficient working capital management (smooth inventory and receivables cycles).

Value Chain Position

Graco operates midstream in the fluid-handling equipment value chain, designing and manufacturing systems and parts that are sold through third-party distributors to end users (contractors, manufacturers). Its primary activities include:

• R&D: 4%–5% of revenue, focused on developing reliable, productivity-enhancing solutions.
• Manufacturing: Co-located with R&D in Minneapolis for 90% of products, enabling rapid innovation and quality control.
• Distribution: Relies on tens of thousands of distributors in 100 countries, who earn healthy margins to ensure strong service and inventory availability.
• Aftermarket Service: Critical for maintaining systems, with 40%–50% of orders being aftermarket parts delivered same-day.

Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy:

• Distributor-Centric: Graco invests heavily in distributor relationships, holding inventory centrally to ensure fast delivery and high turns. Sales technicians actively engage with distributors (e.g., leaving business cards at Home Depot).
• Premium Positioning: Commands premium pricing due to reliability, serviceability, and ROI for customers.
• Aftermarket Focus: Leverages the installed base to generate recurring, high-margin revenue.

Competitive Advantage:

• Product Differentiation: High-quality, reliable products with lower breakdown rates.
• Distribution Network: Extensive, well-supported network in 100 countries.
• Aftermarket Stickiness: Mission-critical systems and corrosive fluids create high switching costs.

Customers and Suppliers

• Customers:
• Contractors: Professional painters and builders purchasing through Home Depot or Sherwin-Williams.
• Industrial Manufacturers: Large firms (e.g., Pepsi) using systems in production lines for food, semiconductors, automotive, etc.
• Stickiness: Industrial customers are highly sticky due to mission-critical applications (e.g., a $100,000 pump in a Doritos line). Contractors exhibit loyalty due to reliability and serviceability.
• Suppliers:
• Primarily provide metals and plastics, which form the bulk of COGS. Labor is only 7%–8% of COGS, indicating low reliance on labor-intensive inputs.
• Graco benefits from favorable supply agreements due to its scale and long-term relationships.

Pricing

• Contract Structure: Not explicitly detailed, but likely involves one-time system sales and recurring aftermarket part orders. Industrial contracts may include service agreements for maintenance.
• Pricing Dynamics:
• Premium Pricing: Graco charges a premium (e.g., $2,500–$3,000 vs. Wagner’s $1,000 sprayers) due to reliability, user loyalty, and ROI.
• Pricing Power: 2% annual price increases, driven by value-added to distributors and end users (e.g., fast delivery, mission-critical reliability).
• Mission-Criticality: Industrial systems are small but essential components of larger processes, reducing price sensitivity.
• Aftermarket Margins: Higher margins on aftermarket parts due to low competition and high demand for replacements.

Bottoms-Up Drivers

Revenue Model & Drivers

Graco generates revenue through:

1. New System Sales (60%): One-time sales of paint sprayers, pumps, and industrial systems. Pricing varies from $2,500–$3,000 for contractor sprayers to tens of thousands for industrial systems.
2. Aftermarket Parts (40%): Recurring revenue from replacement parts, generating 5–6x the initial system cost over its lifetime. This is higher-margin and stickier due to corrosive fluid wear.

Revenue Drivers:

• Pricing (2% Growth):
• Driven by product reliability, user loyalty, and mission-critical applications.
• Distributors value Graco’s inventory management and fast delivery, justifying premium pricing.
• Low price sensitivity in industrial applications (e.g., a $100,000 pump is a small cost relative to production line downtime).
• Volume (4% Growth):
• Industrial production growth (3%): Tied to global manufacturing activity.
• New products (1%): Driven by 4%–5% R&D spend, though vitality index has declined.
• Acquisitions: Targeting niche applications (e.g., semiconductors), with some growing 10x since acquisition.
• Mix Effects:
• Shift toward aftermarket revenue (40%) increases margins due to lower competition and higher profitability.
• Geographic expansion into high-wage countries drives demand for productivity solutions.

Organic vs. Inorganic:

• Organic growth: ~6% annually (3% industrial, 2% pricing, 1% new products).
• Inorganic growth: Historically significant but less impactful recently. Small acquisitions ($20M–$50M) in niche markets (e.g., semiconductors) have driven outsized growth.

Cost Structure & Drivers

COGS:

• Composition: Primarily metals and plastics, with labor at 7%–8% of COGS (low compared to industry norms).
• Drivers: Favorable supply agreements and scale reduce material costs. Co-location of manufacturing and R&D in Minneapolis minimizes labor cost inefficiencies.
• % of Revenue: ~45%–49% (yielding 51%–55% gross margin).

Operating Expenses:

• R&D: 4%–5% of revenue, consistent over time, focused on new product development.
• G&A: 7%–8% of revenue, stable, reflecting disciplined cost management.
• Sales & Distribution: Declined from high-teens to low-teens % of revenue over 20 years, driven by operating leverage from aftermarket sales (captive customers require less sales effort).
• % of Revenue: ~15%–20% (R&D + G&A + Sales), yielding ~30% EBITDA margin.

Fixed vs. Variable Costs:

• Fixed Costs: High fixed cost base (manufacturing facilities, R&D, G&A) drives operating leverage. Graco’s culture emphasizes keeping fixed costs flat year-over-year through process improvements.
• Variable Costs: Primarily material costs (metals, plastics), which are managed through supply agreements and scale. Labor is a small variable component.

EBITDA Margin Dynamics:

• Stable at ~30% due to:
• High-margin aftermarket revenue (40% of total).
• Operating leverage from flat fixed costs and declining sales/distribution spend (% of revenue).
• Efficient manufacturing (revenue per employee doubled in 15–20 years).

FCF Drivers

• Net Income: ~$600 million, closely aligned with FCF due to low CapEx and efficient working capital.
• CapEx:
• Total: 3%–5% of revenue ($66M–$110M).
• Maintenance: 2%–3% ($44M–$66M).
• Growth: 1%–2% ($22M–$44M), including capacity expansions (e.g., powder coatings).
• NWC: Smooth inventory and receivables cycles, with high inventory turns due to centralized inventory management.
• Cash Conversion Cycle: Likely short, given fast delivery (40%–50% of orders by noon ship same day) and low receivables risk (sticky customers).

Capital Deployment

• Share Buybacks: 1%–2% of shares annually, with historical buybacks at 16x earnings (e.g., 22% from Gray family, 5% in mid-2000s). Current valuations (20x earnings) limit aggressive repurchasing.
• Acquisitions: Small, niche deals ($20M–$50M) targeting new applications (e.g., semiconductors, electric vehicles). A 2015 semiconductor acquisition grew 10x, showcasing disciplined M&A.
• Dividends: Regular dividend paid, but not a primary focus.
• Cash Reserves: Significant cash on balance sheet, used for acquisitions (e.g., ITW’s business in 2011) without issuing equity. Provides flexibility but criticized as over-equitized.

Market, Competitive Landscape, Strategy

Market Size and Growth

• Market Size: Not explicitly quantified, but Graco’s $2.2 billion revenue suggests a niche within the broader fluid-handling equipment market. Applications span construction, food production, semiconductors, automotive, and more.
• Growth:
• Volume: Driven by global industrial production growth (3%) and demand for productivity solutions in high-wage/rising-wage countries.
• Price: 2% annual increases, supported by reliability and mission-criticality.
• Absolute: ~6% organic growth, with acquisitions adding upside in niche markets.

Market Structure

• Competitors: Wagner (private German company, lower-priced), Nordson (industrial focus), and smaller players like Campbell Hausfeld (owned by Berkshire Hathaway’s Scott Fetzer).
• Structure: Fragmented at the low end (contractor segment) with competition from Wagner. Concentrated at the high end (industrial segment) with fewer players due to customization and expertise barriers.
• Minimum Efficient Scale (MES): High MES in industrial applications due to R&D and manufacturing complexity, limiting competitors. Lower MES in contractor segment allows more players (e.g., Wagner).
• Industry Traits: Stable demand tied to industrial production and wage growth. Low cyclicality in aftermarket revenue, though system sales can be cyclical (e.g., 2008–2009 downturn).

Competitive Positioning

• Positioning: Premium provider of high-quality, reliable fluid-handling solutions. Targets professional contractors and industrial manufacturers seeking productivity and uptime.
• Differentiation:
• Product Quality: Lower breakdown rates and higher user loyalty (e.g., Graco sprayers vs. Wagner).
• Distribution: Invests 4% of revenue in R&D (vs. competitors’ 2%) and supports distributors with inventory and service, driving higher turns.
• Aftermarket: 5–6x system cost in recurring revenue, with high switching costs in industrial applications.
• Risk of Disintermediation: Low, as Graco’s niche expertise and distribution network are hard to replicate (e.g., Carlisle’s failed attempt to mimic Graco).

Market Share & Relative Growth

• Market Share: Graco is a leader in high-end paint sprayers and industrial fluid-handling systems. It has gained share in powder coatings from Nordson and Wagner.
• Relative Growth: 6% organic growth exceeds industrial production growth (3%), driven by pricing (2%) and new products/acquisitions (1%+).

Hamilton’s 7 Powers Analysis

1. Economies of Scale: Strong in industrial segment due to high fixed costs (R&D, manufacturing) and low variable costs (labor at 7%–8% of COGS). Enables premium pricing and high margins.
2. Network Effects: Limited, as Graco’s model relies on distributor relationships rather than user-to-user effects.
3. Branding: Strong among contractors due to reliability and loyalty (e.g., store managers wearing Graco shirts). Less relevant in industrial segment, where functionality drives decisions.
4. Counter-Positioning: Graco’s focus on high-quality, customized solutions and distributor support counters competitors’ lower-priced, mass-produced offerings (e.g., Wagner).
5. Cornered Resource: Proprietary engineering and manufacturing know-how, co-located in Minneapolis, drives rapid innovation and quality control.
6. Process Power: Culture of continuous improvement keeps fixed costs flat year-over-year, enhancing efficiency (e.g., revenue per employee doubled in 15–20 years).
7. Switching Costs: High in industrial segment due to mission-critical systems (e.g., a $100,000 pump in a Doritos line). Moderate in contractor segment due to loyalty but competitive alternatives.

Strategic Logic

• CapEx Cycles: Defensive investments (2%–3% maintenance CapEx) maintain efficiency, while growth CapEx (1%–2%) targets market share gains (e.g., powder coatings expansion).
• Vertical Integration: Co-located R&D and manufacturing reduce costs and accelerate innovation, enhancing product quality and customer willingness to pay.
• Horizontal Integration: Small acquisitions ($20M–$50M) expand into adjacent markets (e.g., semiconductors, electric vehicles), leveraging existing distribution and expertise.
• Cultural Alignment: A “daily drumbeat” of performance and continuous improvement aligns with the business’s productivity-focused value proposition, sustaining the flywheel.

Valuation

• Current Valuation: $13 billion market cap, trading at ~20x earnings. Reflects a premium due to high ROIC (30%), ROE (35%–40%), and stable margins (30% EBITDA).
• Growth Expectations: To justify 20x earnings, Graco must sustain 6%–8% revenue growth (organic + acquisitions) and achieve double-digit EPS growth via margin expansion (pricing gains) and share buybacks (1%–2% annually).
• Historical Performance: Outperformed the S&P 500 by 3% annually over the past 10 years, driven by consistent compounding.
• Risks to Valuation:
• New Product Decline: Falling vitality index (below 30%) could reduce organic growth below 6%, eroding investor confidence.
• Large Acquisition: A leveraged, distracting deal could disrupt the flywheel and introduce uncertainty.
• Takeout Risk: Low insider ownership increases the likelihood of an acquisition at a premium (e.g., 46%), potentially ending Graco’s independent compounding story.

Key Dynamics and Unique Aspects

Graco’s business model is distinguished by several unique dynamics:

1. Razor-Razorblade Flywheel:
• The 60% system sales and 40% aftermarket revenue create a self-reinforcing cycle. Aftermarket parts, generating 5–6x system cost, are high-margin and sticky due to corrosive fluid wear and mission-critical applications. This drives stable, recurring revenue and high EBITDA margins (30%).
• Unique Insight: The 5–6x aftermarket multiple is unusually high, reflecting Graco’s ability to lock in customers through reliability and serviceability. This contrasts with competitors like Wagner, who compete on price but lack similar aftermarket stickiness.
2. Distributor-Centric GTM:
• Graco’s investment in tens of thousands of distributors across 100 countries, coupled with centralized inventory management, ensures fast delivery (40%–50% same-day) and high inventory turns. Distributors earn healthy margins, incentivizing strong service and loyalty.
• Unique Insight: Graco’s decision to hold inventory centrally (unlike competitors who push inventory to distributors) enhances distributor efficiency and strengthens relationships, creating a competitive moat.
3. Operating Leverage and Cost Discipline:
• A culture of continuous improvement keeps fixed costs flat year-over-year, despite inflation and rising metal prices. This drives operating leverage, with sales/distribution spend declining from high-teens to low-teens % of revenue over 20 years.
• Unique Insight: The alignment between Graco’s productivity-focused products and its internal cost discipline is rare. The “daily drumbeat” of performance mirrors the ROI it delivers to customers, creating a virtuous cycle of efficiency.
4. Niche Market Dominance:
• Graco’s 70,000 SKUs target niche applications with limited competition, particularly in industrial settings. Customization and expertise barriers deter new entrants, while Wagner competes primarily in the lower-end contractor segment.
• Unique Insight: Graco’s failed attempt to acquire ITW’s liquid finishing business (blocked by the FTC) and Carlisle’s subsequent failure to replicate Graco’s model highlight the difficulty of entering these niches, even with capital and expertise.
5. Conservative Capital Allocation:
• Graco’s cash-heavy balance sheet avoids debt, enabling flexibility for small, accretive acquisitions ($20M–$50M) and opportunistic share buybacks (1%–2% annually). This contrasts with competitors like Nordson, who pursue larger, leveraged deals.
• Unique Insight: The “over-equitized” balance sheet is a strategic choice, prioritizing focus and robustness over aggressive leverage. This aligns with Graco’s disciplined ROI mindset, rooted in former CEO George Aristides’ legacy.

Risks

• New Product Development: A declining vitality index (below 30%) signals lower returns on R&D, potentially capping organic growth below 6%.
• Large Acquisitions: A leveraged, distracting deal could disrupt the flywheel and culture, introducing uncertainty.
• Takeout Risk: Low insider ownership increases vulnerability to acquisition, potentially ending Graco’s independent story.
• Cyclicality: System sales are sensitive to industrial downturns (e.g., 2008–2009), though aftermarket revenue provides stability.

Lessons for Investors and Operators

• Investors: Stay focused on high-quality businesses like Graco, even at premium valuations (20x earnings). Compounding at 6%–8% revenue growth with double-digit EPS growth can outperform, as evidenced by Graco’s 3% annual S&P outperformance over 10 years.
• Operators: Build a flywheel aligned with your value proposition. Graco’s productivity-focused products, distributor relationships, and cost discipline create a robust, self-reinforcing model. Avoid distractions (e.g., large acquisitions) and prioritize cultural alignment through deliberate hiring and continuous improvement.

Conclusion

Graco’s business model is a masterclass in niche industrial excellence, leveraging a razor-razorblade flywheel, distributor-centric GTM, and relentless cost discipline to achieve stable 30% EBITDA margins, 30% ROIC, and 6% organic growth. Its ability to generate 5–6x system cost in aftermarket revenue, dominate niche markets, and maintain a cash-heavy balance sheet sets it apart from competitors like Wagner and Nordson. While risks include declining R&D productivity and potential acquisition distractions, Graco’s focus on its flywheel and cultural alignment positions it to continue compounding value for investors.

Transcript