Tags
SaaSCrossover
Background
Ram Parameswaran is the founder of Octahedron Capital and previously a partner at Altimeter Capital. We cover the potential for internet scale business, explore the common characteristics of these businesses, and the most important qualities for 8 business models.
Date
May 1, 2021
Episode Number
207
Principles & Lessons:
- Internet-scale opportunity exists because digital penetration is still low relative to total global GDP, and the key to capturing this opportunity lies in identifying which business models benefit most from reducing friction. Ram quantifies that less than 10% of GDP, transaction volume, and earnings currently flow through internet-native companies, yet the conditions—ubiquitous connectivity, cloud infrastructure, and globally available talent—now exist for that to grow toward 50–70% over time. The core lever, he emphasizes, is friction reduction: “When you reduce friction for developers… or reduce friction for SMBs… that reduces friction to achieve human needs.” This suggests a causal model where technology adoption follows not from novelty, but from the extent to which a product makes something easier, faster, or cheaper to do. Companies that deeply understand and act on this principle—regardless of vertical—are those that will scale.
- TAM is an unreliable variable for assessing early-stage companies, because internet-native businesses tend to create or redefine categories rather than compete in fixed ones. Ram has “dropped completely” the use of total addressable market as a core input, noting, “I’ve always underestimated TAM.” He instead focuses on per-unit economics and growth mentality, because successful internet businesses often expand what the market is, rather than take share within it. The explanation here is epistemological: TAM assessments are often backward-looking and fail to account for innovation-driven shifts. This reveals that TAM is not an objective constraint but a misused heuristic that can obscure genuinely scalable opportunity.
- Growth mentality combined with frugality is a strong indicator of a company’s long-term potential, not because of optics, but because it reflects a culture of learning and resourcefulness under constraint. Ram connects “growth mentality” with teams that are “penny pinchers,” citing Amazon, DoorDash, ByteDance, and Facebook. He argues that frugality is not simply cost discipline—it is a proxy for focus and efficiency: “Frugality and growth mentality almost go hand in hand… trying to get the most oomph out of what little resources you have.” The key epistemic insight is that companies that operate under self-imposed constraints often learn faster and iterate better, gaining deeper knowledge about what actually drives results.
- Product-market fit is not sufficient—successful internet businesses find unconventional, repeatable playbooks to scale through creative growth channels and local process advantages. Ram emphasizes that the best companies don’t rely on standard SEM/SEO or Facebook ads alone. Carvana’s radio-driven city-by-city launch strategy or DoorDash’s partnership with Square’s Cash App exemplify “internet-scale behavior” because they show lateral thinking and adaptability. He highlights that local process—street-level fighting and refinement—is what enables businesses to outlearn competitors over time. This process power is not ancillary but core to defensibility: “Every day they increase their operations just a little better… before you know it, the compounding effects put you so far ahead of the competition.”
- Not all frequency is equal, and where frequency is low, businesses can still create “stickiness” by embedding themselves in recurring value through subscriptions, loyalty, or bundling. Ram explains that while ByteDance offers high-frequency engagement, lower-frequency models like Carvana can still win by inserting auxiliary services (e.g. maintenance, insurance) that increase user attachment: “Even if a company doesn’t have a high-frequency use case, you can insert frequency in the mix.” The broader insight is that user retention and platform strength depend not on the natural cadence of the core transaction but on the creative construction of touchpoints and recurring value—frequency is not given, it can be designed.
- ByteDance’s core innovation is not TikTok, but an organizational model that treats content creation, personalization, and experimentation as systematized and scalable operations. Ram explains that ByteDance is “not an application business,” but a machine learning infrastructure company with a process-centric culture of constant experimentation. Rather than betting on individual product ideas, ByteDance repeatedly tests and scales ideas based on real-time data: “At any point in time, there are probably dozens if not hundreds of experiments being run.” This organizational epistemology—treating knowledge creation as a core competence—gives ByteDance a structural edge that is orthogonal to traditional product-market fit thinking.
- Markets that appear saturated—such as payments or e-commerce—still contain vast opportunities for edge because the core challenge remains conversion efficiency and removing hidden friction. In payments, Ram focuses not on who processes volume, but who increases conversion and reduces transaction loss. “Payments is a tax… the only way to justify it is to improve conversion or add new customers.” This reframes the question from market size or incumbency to causal levers of merchant value creation. Similarly, in e-commerce, what distinguishes winners like Shopify or Carvana is not their catalogue, but their ability to “reduce friction” in order flows, shipping, or return logistics. This explanatory shift—focusing on system-level bottlenecks rather than market share—explains why smaller players can still dominate niches.
- The most important traits in investors are not credentials or IQ, but curiosity, resilience, generosity, and willingness to learn from others—and these mirror the traits that define enduring companies. Ram rejects conventional screening: “Resumes are pretty much useless to me.” He instead looks for four uncoachable traits: deep love for learning, work ethic, resilience (persistence and grit), and being a giver, not a taker. This is not a moral stance—it’s a functional one: “Givers… create their own platform of X around them,” compounding insight through shared discovery. The parallel is clear: just as companies scale by building platforms for others, so do investors. Openness to knowledge—rather than guarding ideas—is both a competitive advantage and a higher-leverage epistemology.
Transcript
‣
‣
‣
‣
‣
‣
‣
‣