Cathie Wood - Investing in Innovation

Principles & Lessons:

• Disruptive innovation is structurally mispriced because benchmarks are backward-looking and capital is flowing elsewhere. Cathie Wood argues that the equity market systematically misprices innovation because the dominant investing frameworks—both passive indexing and traditional active management—are anchored in historical performance. "Passive simply mimics benchmarks… that’s very backward looking." Meanwhile, active managers searching for innovation often go private, leaving public-market innovation under-analyzed and under-owned. This mispricing creates a persistent inefficiency that can be captured by those willing to look forward with long-duration views.
• Cost declines from Wright’s Law are the foundational driver of exponential growth in key technologies. ARK Invest anchors its thematic forecasting in Wright’s Law: for every cumulative doubling of units produced, costs fall by a predictable percentage. For each of ARK’s five innovation platforms—genomic sequencing, energy storage, robotics/automation, AI (deep learning), and blockchain—cost curves drive adoption. “We are very focused on those technologically enabled cost curves,” because they allow ARK to estimate when a technology is ready for mass adoption and what the likely demand elasticity will be.
• Benchmarks and valuation multiples are irrelevant if time horizon is long and adoption is exponential. ARK does not screen for stocks using indexes, and they explicitly ignore traditional valuation measures in the short term. "Anyone who looks at current multiples will not want to be part of our strategy." Instead, they ask: will this company compound revenues at 20–30% for the next five years and scale into a dominant platform? This approach redefines value as the present value of exponential future cash flows, not as a static multiple of current earnings.
• Software 2.0 (deep learning) is not just a trend—it’s a general-purpose technology that rewrites the economics of every business. Cathie calls deep learning “Software 2.0” and argues it will affect “every line item of the income statement.” Unlike traditional software, which depended on humans explicitly programming logic, deep learning lets data itself train models, unleashing compounding performance improvements. The result is that all firms must incorporate AI into operations or risk irrelevance: “If you're not thinking about this, you're making a terrible mistake.”
• ARK’s research is structured to learn from and contribute to real-time innovation networks, not financial institutions. Instead of drawing on traditional Wall Street research silos, ARK engages with domain experts via open platforms like Twitter, Medium, and academic collaboration. “We push our research into Twitter… as it is evolving, not when it’s finished.” This enables feedback loops that correct assumptions faster and keep the firm embedded in emerging communities. For example, their early engagement with Coinbase helped shape their conviction around crypto assets well before mainstream finance paid attention.
• The portfolio construction process is led by research, not quantitative screens or sector allocations. Portfolio ideas emerge from bottom-up exploration of innovation ecosystems. Starting with a cornerstone stock like Illumina in genomics or NVIDIA in AI, the team maps out surrounding players across the value chain. They score companies across five criteria, including quality of management and competitive moat, but “valuation” is framed as whether the stock can compound at 15% annually over five years—not in terms of current multiples. If a stock drops below a qualitative score of 5, it's removed regardless of performance.
• Traditional financial training is often counterproductive in the world of exponential innovation. ARK deliberately avoids hiring analysts with traditional Wall Street experience, preferring domain experts (e.g., former engineers, scientists) who can understand the technological trajectory firsthand. “It's unlikely we'll hire anyone from traditional financial services.” This is based on the belief that most finance professionals are conditioned to think linearly, benchmark against history, and avoid volatility—habits incompatible with capturing discontinuous technological change.
• Cathie Wood views ARK as a bridge between Silicon Valley and finance—combining scientific understanding with public market access. This dual identity is intentional: ARK aims to give public market investors access to venture-like innovation, while providing early-stage innovators with capital and recognition from the broader investing world. “We are doing the kind of research I thought venture capital was doing… but it's not.” By sitting between the two worlds—and broadcasting their models and assumptions publicly—ARK can help accelerate both capital formation and public understanding of disruptive change.

Transcript